Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

There is no denying the fact that individual rule in improving the

environment

is debatable,

While

it is a commonly held belief that the government is only what makes a big difference in the

environment

, there is

also

an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that the government should increase the participation of the people.

To begin

with, individuals have become more powerful and can make a positive impact on the

environment

,

In other words

, nowadays not only the big

companies

have all the power because of social media.

In addition

, individual acts can inspire others which can help in changing habits,

For example

, people are more accepting of inspiration from others rather than telling them what to do. Another point to consider

Add a missing verb

is, Governments

show examples

, Governments

Correct your spelling

that governments

and large

companies

have a greater responsibility to address environmental issues, it is

also

possible to say that they have a bigger impact because of their rule in society.

Moreover

, Collaboration between individuals, governments, and

companies

is necessary to improve the

environment

.

For instance

, governments and

companies

need to teach individuals how to keep the

environment

which can help in the long run. In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe that improving the

environment

is a shared task among all participants, I suggest the government do a programme which increases in raising awareness about the

environment

.