Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is said that investments in railways should be valued over spending money on roads by
governments
. I strongly agree with
this
opinion, and the reasons will be outlined. It is my view that dedicating a sizeable amount of money to railways and their infrastructure can resolve several serious problems that big cities suffer from.
For instance
, if
governments
invest in public transportation infrastructure, the traffic problems, especially during rush hours, can be resolved.
Furthermore
, by providing
people
with reliable and frequent public transportation,
governments
not only enhance air quality but
also
decelerate global warming. From an economic point of view, both
people
and
governments
can benefit from the railway system because fares for trains are more economical, and it can be a valuable source of revenue for
governments
.
In contrast
, a group of individuals claims that investing in roads should be taken into consideration
due to
the fact that most
people
are willing to use their own cars for commuting. They firmly insist that using private cars is more convenient, which can lead to a higher standard of living.
Accordingly
, they prefer to see that roads are prioritized.
However
, I do not find
this
argument convincing, as
people
should be encouraged to use sustainable means of transport
such
as subways and trains. Most private automobiles use fossil fuels that produce exhaust gases, leading to environmental problems
such
as the extinction of endangered species. In conclusion, I totally agree with dedicating resources to invest in railways, because, whether from an environmental viewpoint or an economic perspective,
such
investments can offer numerous benefits.
Submitted by m.r.zamani1376678 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
The essay presents relevant main points with clear progression and logical structure; however, strive for more varied linking words and phrases to enhance connectivity.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are present and clear, reinforcing your viewpoint. Keep working on making these elements even more impactful by concisely summarizing the key points and reiterating your position forcefully.
task achievement
Your essay responds to the task effectively by expressing agreement on the preference for rail investment over roads. To score higher, develop your arguments more fully, add further insight or analysis, and provide more concrete examples to back up your points.
task achievement
The ideas are generally clear and comprehensive, but some could be developed and articulated with greater depth. Use a wider range of vocabulary and syntax to express complex ideas more fluently and precisely.
task achievement
While relevant examples are given, strive to incorporate specific, detailed examples to enhance the persuasiveness of your argument, which can directly relate to real-world situations or statistics to strengthen the illustration of your points.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: