Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information,such as theirhobbies and interests,and whether they are married or single.Some people say that thisinformation may be relevant and useful.Others disagree.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In modern
recruitment
Use synonyms
,
employers
Use synonyms
increasingly request personal details from candidates, ranging from marital status to hobbies.
While
Linking Words
some argue that
this
Linking Words
information
Use synonyms
helps companies select suitable employees, I believe that collecting personal
data
Use synonyms
should be strictly limited to
job
Use synonyms
-related purposes, as excessive inquiry may result in unfair practices and undermine professional evaluation. On the one hand, certain personal
information
Use synonyms
may assist
employers
Use synonyms
in assessing a candidate’s capacity to meet
job
Use synonyms
requirements. Some roles,
such
Linking Words
as airline crew or overseas project managers, involve irregular schedules or frequent travel. In these circumstances, asking whether a candidate is able to relocate, work night shifts or adapt to intensive workloads is reasonable, because it enables
employers
Use synonyms
to evaluate availability and resilience.
Similarly
Linking Words
, when a position highly relies on interpersonal skills—
such
Linking Words
as customer service or sales—learning about an applicant’s voluntary work, teamwork experience
or
Punctuation problem
, or
show examples
recreational interests may help identify personality traits relevant to daily performance.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, collecting sensitive
information
Use synonyms
that is
Linking Words
unrelated to
job
Use synonyms
performance carries significant risks. Questions concerning marital status, pregnancy plans or religious beliefs can lead to implicit discrimination and arbitrary rejection. A married applicant,
for instance
Linking Words
, may be perceived as less flexible simply
due to
Linking Words
assumptions rather than evidence of competence.
Therefore
Linking Words
, many jurisdictions regulate
recruitment
Use synonyms
practices to prevent discrimination. The European Union’s General
Data
Use synonyms
Protection Regulation requires
employers
Use synonyms
to demonstrate clear purposes when processing personal
data
Use synonyms
,
while
Linking Words
agencies
such
Linking Words
as the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission restrict inquiries into topics that could unfairly influence hiring decisions. These frameworks ensure equal access to employment opportunities and protect candidates from inappropriate profiling. In light of these considerations,
employers
Use synonyms
should adopt a principle of proportionality. They may collect
information
Use synonyms
that directly affects
job
Use synonyms
performance, but should refrain from requesting private details that do not serve
recruitment
Use synonyms
objectives. Competency-based interviews, skill assessments and transparent probation periods offer far more reliable methods of evaluating suitability than personal questions. In conclusion, some personal
information
Use synonyms
can legitimately support hiring decisions, yet asking about sensitive or irrelevant matters risks discrimination and erodes fairness. A professional
recruitment
Use synonyms
process should prioritise merit, limit
data
Use synonyms
collection and safeguard the dignity of
job
Use synonyms
seekers.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

structure
Keep a clear plan: state your view, then discuss both sides, and end with your own view.
language use
Use short and simple words. This helps show a simple style.
coherence
Link ideas with small words like and, but, also, in addition to show how points fit.
content
The essay shows a clear view and good balance of ideas.
language
Strong link words help flow at a steady pace.
Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: