Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some believe that not all old

buildings

have the same value, and some of them are not worth preserving. Personally, I completely agree with

this

opinion. One of the reasons why I believe so is that some old

buildings

have a higher value from a historical point of view. It would be a crime to demolish a palace or an old museum with a lot of history and to lose all its past without preserving it. Demolishing an old condominium,

however

, would not be a big historical loss, unless some crucial historical events happened there.

Therefore

, in comparison to a palace, an old apartment house with no history definitely loses and is not worth preserving and spending money on it.

This

leads to the next reason: preserving an old building requires

spendings

Fix the agreement mistake

spending

show examples

for restoration and taking care of construction.

Therefore

, it would be impossible to preserve all old

buildings

, as the state and private companies’ budget is not endless and they need to choose a construction to spend their money on.

Thus

, humanity has to decide which

buildings

are worth preserving more from the financial point of view. To clarify, some

buildings

can be turned into museums and may bring some profit by selling tickets for exhibitions,

while

others may be not that interesting for an ordinary person and

hence

, less profitable. Taking everything into consideration, I completely agree with the statement that certain old

buildings

are more worth taking care of, as some of them are more historically and financially valuable and can be profitable in the long term.