Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.
The perennial debate on whether nations should predominantly invest in vocational training over tertiary
education
ignites varied perspectives. This
essay contends that while
practical skills
are imperative, the merits of a university
education
cannot be undermined.
Primarily, proponents advocating spending more money on skills
and vocational training underscore the immediate applicability of such
skills
in the workforce. Practical work tends to offer swift economic benefits, as it equips individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labour market rapidly. For instance
, a surge in skilled labourers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.
Contrastingly, those who support the motion to spend money on university
education
argue that higher education
cultivates a more profound skill set, including critical thinking, analytical abilities, and versatility, which are indispensable in the dynamic global market. Universities act as incubators for professionals like engineers, doctors, and educators, whose roles cannot be understated. These institutions not only provide theoretical knowledge but also
encourage research and development. A quintessential example would be the role university
research plays in medical breakthroughs, which are fundamental to societal progression.
However
, juxtaposing these two educational pathways presents a false dichotomy. It is crucial to acknowledge that both vocational training and university
education
serve distinct yet complementary purposes. Investing in both areas can yield a more holistic and robust workforce. A balanced approach would not only harness immediate skill sets but also
foster long-term intellectual capital which could adapt to future changes in the job market.
In conclusion, a balanced allocation of funds towards both vocational training and university
education
is imperative. The former addresses immediate economic demands with practical skills
, while
the latter ensures long-term societal progress through intellectual development. This
dual investment strategy is crucial for a nation's comprehensive growth.Submitted by ashissarker18 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Response
To improve your task response score, make sure you fully address all parts of the question. This includes stating your own opinion clearly if the question asks for it, and ensuring that you expand on all points with detailed examples and explanations. Aim to include more specific examples to enrich your argument and to firmly anchor your discussion in real-world contexts.
Coherence and Cohesion
You have demonstrated strong coherence and cohesion with a clear logical structure and well-defined introduction and conclusion. To further enhance your writing, consider varying your linking devices and make sure your paragraphs flow seamlessly from one idea to the next. Additionally, aim to consistently support main points with clear and relevant examples throughout your essay.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.