Wild
animals
have no place in the 21st Use synonyms
century
, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Protecting wild Use synonyms
animals
in the 21st Use synonyms
century
is an arguable debate subject, with advocating them as a costly one. I firmly disagree that it is a responsibility to protect animal species for humans in today's world and they are a boon to get benefits to alleviate diseases.
The first and foremost argument is that some Use synonyms
animals
might be useful to open a door to findings in our Use synonyms
century
. Put simply, nowadays, several rare species are used to find new medicines and treatments. What is more, after finding a plethora of medicines, they might be tested on Use synonyms
animals
to ensure that they are 100 per cent safe for human use. To cite an example, certain experts attempt to release the poison of scorpions, and Use synonyms
then
test them on mice to be sure for safety. They are invaluable in mitigating serious issues that are related to today's well-known illnesses Linking Words
such
as cancer.
Another argument is that deliberating that wild Linking Words
animals
should become extinct is Use synonyms
irresponsible
and cruel opinion. Each animal should have its rights Correct article usage
an irresponsible
as well as
people in the world. Linking Words
Although
wild Linking Words
animals
were generally hunted by people for sport or fun purposes in the past, there are many laws and proponents about Use synonyms
animals
to curb their extinction in today's society. Use synonyms
For instance
, Turkey has laws in its constitution about Linking Words
animals
, and misbehaves are illegal, they are culprit Use synonyms
otherwise
.
Linking Words
To conclude
, despite concerns about wild Linking Words
animals
that they can not have a place because of costs in Use synonyms
this
Linking Words
century
, protecting and getting benefits are substantial steps for humanity Use synonyms
as well as
prosperity.Linking Words
yusifakhmad