The opinion on preserving endangered languages varies; while some believe that governments should invest in saving them, others consider it a wasteful expenditure. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Some representatives of contemporary society believe that governments should invest in rare
languages
​​in order to preserve them for future generations,
while
others believe that
such
expenditures do not make sense. From my perspective, it is undeniable that these statements contain only a small fraction of the truth.
Therefore
, in
this
article, I will reflect on my own views on
this
issue and discuss both perspectives. On the one hand, the old-fashioned mother tongue gives people a better understanding of the way our ancestors lived.
Additionally
, we have been using dialects, words, and slang from certain ancient
languages
​​for centuries.
For example
, Latin is the lingua franca of doctors and nurses because core medical rules are made up of Latin terms.
However
, it would be unfair
not to mention
the fact that modern words have their origins in ancient dialects.
Therefore
, politics should focus on saving
this
communication with the past,
otherwise
, future generations will forget their ancestors.
On the other hand
, some experts claim that governments should care about native
languages
​​rather than rescuing meaningless dialects of extinct
languages
. In my opinion, one of the main reasons some people make
this
point is correlation.
For example
, most teenagers and students do not know their native language well enough and often write and speak incorrectly. To prevent
this
situation from getting worse, the government should spend a lot of money on educational purposes
instead
of on old projects like preserving vocabulary.
Thus
, the state sector can receive a literate society that will possess educational and social skills. Having said all that, I would like to emphasize that
this
tendency is open to criticism when these points are made. Still, only local politicians have to decide which language they prefer to keep.
Submitted by yuqingchen10 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Introduction & Conclusion
Ensure that your introduction and conclusion are clear and distinctly summarize the main points of your discussion, including your own opinion.
Development of Main Points
Present your main points more clearly, ensuring that each is developed and expanded upon with relevant arguments and examples.
Coherence & Cohesion
Improve the logical flow by connecting ideas more effectively and using a range of cohesive devices accurately.
Task Achievement
Your response must address all parts of the task prompt fully, including a balanced discussion of both views and a clear statement of your own opinion.
Supporting Examples
Make sure to include specific, relevant examples to support your points, enhancing the persuasive and explanatory power of your essay.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: