Some people believe that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money should be invested better in other areas. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Some people reckon that spending on
arts
is a waste of municipal budgets
and governments
should spend their municipal budgets
on other investments. While
there is a need for governments
to develop arts
, I completely agree that they should invest their financial budgets
in other departments.
On the one hand, governments
are responsible for boosting the development of arts
and probably benefit a lot from them. The primary reason is that governments
are supposed to protect the paintings and other art
crafts in museums. This
is because these artificial items are usually symbols of ancient cultures in certain areas and contribute to cultural diversity to some degree. Secondly
, investments in paintings and other forms of art
are more likely to promote economic development. For example
, beautiful drawings in art
galleries and artificial designs on municipal architecture probably attract tourists to their regions and thus
improve their economy. Therefore
, expenses on arts
can benefit governments
from both cultural and economic aspects.
Regardless of the arguments mentioned above, I consider that authorities should save their money and spend it on more profitable departments. Firstly
, alternative measures are more accessible to promote arts
and are more economical, such
as compulsory arts
courses in primary school, painting club campaigns on campus and so on. In other words
, local authorities can easily foster a sense of art
in students and provide professional artificial lessons for children. Secondly
, financial budgets
are essential for other more imperative departments, such
as environmental protection, financial investments and so on. In this
way, governments
can earn more profits by investing in those programs within short terms and thus
have more opportunities to promote social development.
In conclusion, while
spending budgets
on arts
has a range of advantages, such
as cultural protection and economic profits, I would argue that governments
should invest expenses in other important fields.Submitted by 609553855 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
introduction conclusion present
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion which reflect the prompt question adequately. However, the introduction could be enhanced by paraphrasing the topic more effectively.
supported main points
Main points are generally supported, but the arguments could benefit from a wider range of examples and more in-depth analysis to strengthen the response.
complete response
The essay maintains a clear position throughout and addresses the task with a rather complete response, but consider exploring the counter-argument in more detail for a more balanced discussion.
logical structure
The essay has logical structure, but some transitions between ideas could be smoother, and the logical connections can be enhanced by using a wider variety of cohesive devices.
clear comprehensive ideas
Ensure that ideas are clearly and comprehensively expressed, although the clarity is generally good, some sentences could be rephrased for better readability and flow.
relevant specific examples
Specific examples are used, but they are somewhat generic. To improve, include more detailed and varied examples that directly support the main points. Diversify the types of examples used to avoid repetition and add depth to the argument.