Some believe that the government should support artists like musicians, painters, and poets, while others argue that this is a misuse of funds. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Some argue that authority assistance for
artists
Use synonyms
is vital for cultural and artistic development,
while
Linking Words
others believe that it constitutes a misuse of public funds. In my opinion, allocating resources for creatively-minded individuals is justifiable. On the one hand, opponents of government support for the
arts
Use synonyms
contend that
this
Linking Words
money could be better spent
elsewhere
Linking Words
, particularly on more pressing social issues
such
Linking Words
as healthcare, education, and poverty alleviation. Critics make the point that the
arts
Use synonyms
,
while
Linking Words
valuable, are a luxury that should not take precedence over basic public services.
For example
Linking Words
, during times of economic hardship, when governments are faced with budget deficits, many believe that funding for
arts
Use synonyms
programs should be reduced or eliminated to prioritize more immediate needs.
This
Linking Words
is evident in countries like Greece, where austerity measures have forced significant cuts to public services. These critics argue
artists
Use synonyms
should seek funding through private means or market-based initiatives,
such
Linking Words
as sponsorships or crowdfunding, rather than straining taxpayers.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, those in favour of government support for
artists
Use synonyms
argue that the
arts
Use synonyms
are an essential part of society’s cultural heritage and identity. Without funding, many
artists
Use synonyms
would struggle to create their work, which could lead to a decline in cultural production.
For instance
Linking Words
, state funding has been crucial for the preservation and development of various art forms. In the United Kingdom, the National Lottery Fund allocates money to
arts
Use synonyms
projects, helping to support everything from local theatre productions to international art exhibitions. These investments can stimulate creativity, enrich society, and attract tourists. In fact, art often generates substantial revenue through tourism, as visitors flock to cities known for their cultural institutions and festivals.
Therefore
Linking Words
, state funding is a means to promote national pride and economic growth. In conclusion,
while
Linking Words
both sides present valid arguments, I believe that state aid for
artists
Use synonyms
is crucial for the long-term cultural and economic health of society, provided that it is managed prudently and in conjunction with other societal priorities. A well-balanced allocation of funds can ensure that both the
Arts
Use synonyms
and essential public services are adequately supported.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central idea and that all sentences contribute to it. Some points could be more deeply developed to enhance clarity and impact.
cohesion
While your examples are relevant, you could integrate them more seamlessly into your arguments for a smoother flow. This will help strengthen your overall coherence.
positive
Your essay presents a balanced view of both sides of the argument clearly, demonstrating an understanding of the complexities involved in government funding for the arts.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • cultural heritage
  • cultural diversity
  • innovation
  • creativity
  • trickle-down effect
  • national pride
  • artistic independence
  • government funding
  • taxpayer burden
  • compromise integrity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: