Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It has been argued that international sports leagues can help cultivate good relationships between participating

countries

and can

also

serve as a safer outlet to release patriotic feelings. In my opinion, the given statement has certain limitations. An international tournament cannot be a means to cool down tensions between

two

countries

,

although

it is suggested that it can be beneficial to some extent in releasing feelings of nationalism.

Firstly

, a sports event between

countries

cannot determine the fate of their

relationship

. Each sport has a limited audience, and a sport cannot be taken seriously as a decisive factor in the

relationship

with another country. It can only be beneficial for the audience to express their feelings.

For example

, consider the India and Pakistan cricket match; a tournament between the

two

does not ease their

relationship

;

instead

, it only allows the audience from both sides to release emotions.

Secondly

, it is government policy and stance that can help ease international tension between

countries

. The matter entirely depends on the hands of the government. Government policies, trade, aid, and future goals are the factors that decide the pattern of their

relationship

.

For example

, take India and Sri Lanka; the

relationship

between the

two

countries

gained strength

due to

trade policies and the aid provided to each other. In conclusion, a sports event cannot ease the

relationship

between

countries

. The policies of their respective governments are the main factors in reducing tension between the

two

.