In contemporary society, some people think that wealth is the main factor which makes it possible for individuals' well-being, but others argue budget in the countries, the more there is comfortable living because the budget is a foundation of development.
this
idea. Linking Words
Therefore
, Linking Words
although
some nations are already rich and bring about the addition of economic wealth which increases, citizens in the countries do not feel more satisfied. Linking Words
This
essay will discuss both sides of the controversy, and my opinion will be provided.
On the one hand, advocates of Linking Words
this
perspective believe that even if arises stable finance in nations that are already rich, it does not help the population in Linking Words
this
country be more pleased. Linking Words
It is clear that
economics is not a major determiner that allows people to pleasure in living. Linking Words
In other words
, some regions may lack a variety of conveniences Linking Words
such
as amusements, transport, and other facilities.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, those against the idea of people in the rich countries feel that are not satisfied, despite additional increases in finance. The reason is that the more there isLinking Words
Add an article
a
the
Furthermore
, the government will spend Linking Words
this
fund on the generation of places which satisfy individuals, and they can provide a lot of supplies Linking Words
such
as food and materials. Linking Words
As a result
, the high-income regions can bring about benefits for citizens.
In conclusion, some researchers believe that wealthy nations do not cause the population to feel more comfortable. In my view, I strongly disagree with Linking Words
this
issue because money is a basic part of life.Linking Words
champperkhu