It is believed that increasing fossil
fuel
prices will be an efficient way to shield humans from pollution and tackle environmental issues. Use synonyms
This
essay presents a contrasting perspective with the statement since it could lead to economic strain and social effects.
Linking Words
Although
increasing the costs of Linking Words
fuel
may reduce consumption in developing and developed countries, it Use synonyms
also
has a consequence for the economy, especially in developing countries where transportation is a lifeline for economic activities. Fossil fuels are a common source of transport, including public and private vehicles, higher Linking Words
fuel
costs could become the reason why citizens cannot afford and delay their generation income. Use synonyms
As a result
, the whole economic development of a country would fall down or slow down. It not only affects pedestrians' work but has an effect on countries' economies.
Linking Words
Additionally
, there are majority of people who go to work in their vehicles use Linking Words
fuel
and lower-income groups use transportation as a way to generate money, if the price of fossil Use synonyms
fuel
goes higher Use synonyms
then
it would widespread dissatisfaction among middle, Linking Words
due to
these people spend a higher percentage of their income on transport and lead to economic strain. Linking Words
Moreover
, it could exacerbate inequality between the poverty and the wealthy, Linking Words
for instance
, Linking Words
a classes
could show off how they can purchase fossils and others cannot, which would make the lower-income groups feel disrespected and embarrassed about themselves.
In conclusion, increasing the costs of fossil fuels is not an effective way to tackle environmental problems and it Correct the article-noun agreement
classes
a class
also
has negative consequences social and economic. Citizens may face widespread inequality and the economy would be fragile.Linking Words
nguyen.kogu17