The funds for postgraduate research are limited; therefore some people think that the government should provide financial support. In their opinion, only scientific research should be funded, rather than other less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Nowadays,
due to
the limited availability of state funds, some individuals argue that governments should financially support only students in scientific programs. I disagree with
this
view, asserting that the money should not be spent solely on science courses. I believe that governments should strive to support all postgraduate students, regardless of their field of study. Looking at the details, it is inevitable to fund the scientific research of postgraduates, as these areas of study can enrich students' current knowledge.
Such
funding can make them highly inventive, especially in developing new technologies and making new discoveries.
For example
, technological experimentation has enabled the exploration of many distinct planets in recent years. Scientific study often leads to advancements in technology, medicine, and other fields, which can have a direct and meaningful impact on society. Financial support for scientific investigation can accelerate innovations that benefit public health, the environment, and the economy.
On the other hand
, the state should
also
subsidize non-scientific postgraduate degrees, like economics, literature, and other subjects.
For instance
, studying economics can produce political economists who better analyze a country's finances. Eventually, they may contribute to politics, helping to prevent future crises and make a country economically stronger.
Moreover
, global challenges often require interdisciplinary approaches. Encouraging collaboration between scientific and non-scientific disciplines can create holistic solutions to issues related to climate change or public health crises.
To conclude
, I believe that money should be allocated to scientific exploration.
Additionally
, educational funding wouldn't go to waste if invested in other research areas.
Submitted by shahobhozratkulov on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
To enhance your essay further, consider expanding on the examples provided. Adding more specific details and evidence can strengthen your argument.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that every paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. While your essay is well-structured, improving the flow between ideas can make your argument more compelling.
coherence cohesion
Your conclusion could restate the main points more clearly. This reinforces your argument and provides a stronger ending to your essay.
task achievement
You have effectively presented a balanced argument, acknowledging the importance of scientific and non-scientific postgraduate studies.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is well-organized, with clear paragraphs dedicated to different aspects of the argument.
task achievement
The examples you provided are relevant and help illustrate your points effectively.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • postgraduate research
  • financial support
  • scientific research
  • funding
  • advancements
  • technology
  • medicine
  • direct impact
  • society
  • public health
  • economy
  • humanities
  • social sciences
  • human behavior
  • culture
  • ethics
  • context
  • technological advances
  • balanced approach
  • allocation of funds
  • disciplines
  • knowledge progression
  • societal development
  • long-term benefit
  • education methods
  • mental health interventions
  • quality of life
  • interdisciplinary research
  • global challenges
  • collaboration
  • holistic solutions
  • climate change
  • public health crises
What to do next:
Look at other essays: