Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often suggested that more prosperous countries should support deprived nations with humanitarian
aid
during catastrophic natural disasters. This
essay agrees with the statement because it is natural to help others in a difficult position and richer country's financial levels will not affected by International service.
Humans are social creatures that should help others during challenging situations. Helping others that in critical need of some support during natural causes is essential to prove that humanity is above everything. Moreover
, natural disasters are unpredictable occasion
, which might Fix the agreement mistake
occasions
also
happen anywhere and anytime and when natural emergencies occur in our country, we are also
forced to find substantial support from wealthier states. For example
, Palestine helped Indonesia during the Tsunami in 2004, and with the current ongoing war in Palestine, Indonesia is returning the social charity by providing humanitarian aid
to Palestine.
The prosperous nations' economic structure level will not be heavily impacted by providing International humanitarian compensation. They have excessive amounts of resources such
as energy, fuels and food and even they are unable to do with the deposits and leftovers of supplies. Consequently
, by providing big-scale International aid
, they can allocate their excessive resources to the land that is
affected by catastrophic disasters without disrupting their financial structure. For example
, the US, which is known as a superpower nation, often conducts humanitarian aid
. We have rarely heard the news about the US becoming financially unstable after social charities.
In conclusion, the richer region should allocate their resources to help the non-developed communities during natural causes because helping is part of society as humans and the financial stature of the wealthy public will not be affected by giving to social charities.Submitted by dwityawaskitoent on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Coherence & Cohesion
Maintain a clear position throughout your response. While you effectively agreed with the statement and provided a consistent opinion, ensure that every paragraph reinforces your stance to maximize coherence.
Coherence & Cohesion
Organize ideas logically by ensuring each body paragraph presents a single main idea and is well-expanded with supporting sentences. This will improve the logical flow and clarity of your argument.
Task Achievement
Begin with an introduction that provides a clear thesis statement outlining the main points you will discuss. Conclude with a paragraph that summarizes these points and restates your position to provide a complete response with a clear structure.
Task Achievement
Develop your ideas fully to connect back to the main topic, ensuring all parts of the task are addressed comprehensively.
Task Achievement
Illustrate your main points with specific examples to support your argument. Doing so strengthens the overall persuasiveness and specificity of your essay. Try to ensure examples are both relevant and detailed.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?