Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only large companies and goverments can make a difference. What extent do you agree or disagree.

In the present society, different kinds of environmental problems are unquestionably one of the most controversial topics of debate these days.
This
affects all of us worldwide since studies show a significant increase in global issues. In the forthcoming paragraphs,
this
essay will elucidate my strong disagreement that only authority and companies could make any difference in improving our earth.
To begin
with, one of the major reasons why individuals' actions are essential is their efficiency and sustainability. Many people believe that large multi-companies and laws could bring several benefits to the environment, but I think humankind has the most powerful impact on our living world. Undoubtedly, ministers and leaders can take steps to solve global issues,
for instance
with environmental protection policies, but to be honest in my opinion nowadays ministries have other huge problems to deal with.
Additionally
, large companies are usually profit-orientated and focusing on their purchases and exports so
due to
this
, I can not trust in the big industries.
Furthermore
, people have the power to make a huge change by their actions and behaviours to
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
nature. I believe, that if humans would think more considerably and respectfully about our earth, our environment would be much healthier. People should understand that they have the ability to make significant changes,
for example
, they can reduce carbon emissions and fuel consumption which have severe effects on public health. Of course, governments can help with
for instance
invest a well-organised railway system. In conclusion, in my way of thinking allocating a great proportion of human funding to our nature would be a wise decision because of the advantages provided in the economic, social and environmental spheres, which will guarantee a vibrant future for the world.
Submitted by palvdori on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion were present, which is important for the logical structure of the essay. However, make sure that your introduction clearly states your main argument and your conclusion should effectively summarize the points made. Try to use transition words to create a more fluid connection between paragraphs and sentences. Also, be consistent in your tense usage and formatting throughout the essay.
task achievement
Your essay addressed the task, but the argument could be strengthened with more specific examples and explanations to support your points. Instead of general statements, provide concrete instances where individual actions have had a positive environmental impact. Furthermore, ensure that each paragraph clearly relates to your central thesis and that the ideas are fully developed. Balance is also key; if discussing why large companies and governments are less effective, provide clear reasonings and evidence to support this view.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainability
  • environmental conservation
  • grassroots movements
  • corporate responsibility
  • government regulations
  • sustainable change
  • reduce, reuse, recycle
  • energy efficiency
  • pollution control
  • carbon footprint
  • eco-friendly choices
  • public awareness
  • green initiatives
  • advocacy
  • conservation efforts
What to do next:
Look at other essays: