The most important aim of science should be improve people's live. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

In the contemporary era, scientific advancements wield immense power to transform human existence, promising to alleviate suffering, extend longevity, and foster deeper connections among individuals.
While
it is undeniable that
science
holds the potential to enhance the quality of life for many, the singular aim of
science
should not solely be the improvement of human
lives
.
Instead
, a balanced approach that considers ethical, environmental, and societal implications is imperative. Undoubtedly, scientific breakthroughs have revolutionized healthcare, enabling the treatment and eradication of once-debilitating diseases, thereby prolonging
human
Add an article
the human
show examples
lifespan.
For instance
, the development of vaccines has played a pivotal role in curbing the spread of infectious illnesses, saving countless
lives
and offering hope for a healthier future.
Additionally
, advancements in medical technology,
such
as robotic surgery and personalized medicine, have enhanced the precision and efficacy of treatments, underscoring the indispensable role of
science
in safeguarding human health.
However
, it is crucial to recognize that the pursuit of scientific progress must be tempered by ethical considerations and a commitment to sustainability. Blind adherence to the mantra of "improving
lives
" without regard for the broader consequences can lead to unintended harm.
For instance
, unchecked exploitation of natural resources in the name of scientific advancement can exacerbate environmental degradation, jeopardizing the well-being of current and future generations.
Therefore
, a holistic approach that integrates scientific innovation with ethical principles and environmental stewardship is essential for ensuring the long-term flourishing of humanity.
Moreover
, the overarching goal of
science
should not be limited to individual well-being but should encompass the collective welfare of society as a whole.
While
scientific discoveries have the potential to foster connectivity and facilitate communication across geographic boundaries, they can
also
exacerbate disparities and deepen societal divisions if access to technology is unequal.
Thus
, efforts to harness the power of
science
must be accompanied by initiatives to bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable distribution of benefits, thereby fostering inclusive development and social cohesion. In conclusion,
while
the advancement of
science
holds immense promise for improving human
lives
, it is imperative to adopt a nuanced approach that considers ethical, environmental, and societal factors. By embracing a holistic vision that prioritizes sustainability, equity, and collective well-being, we can harness the transformative potential of
science
to create a more just, resilient, and harmonious world.
Submitted by ru.kabiru.biru on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
To improve task achievement, ensure that your essay directly addresses the question asked by stating your position clearly and maintaining this viewpoint throughout the essay. While exploring various dimensions of the topic, always bring the discussion back to how it relates to the question's statement.
coherence cohesion
Enhance coherence and cohesion by using a wider variety of linking words and phrases to better connect ideas within and between paragraphs. Moreover, ensure that each paragraph has a clear main idea supported by relevant examples or explanations which directly relate to the topic.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: