Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Hobbies

, often perceived as sources of pleasure, can range from delightfully engaging to unexpectedly challenging. Some argue that the complexity of a

hobby

can dampen one’s enjoyment, suggesting that

difficulty

equates to distress. I partially agree with

this

view, as I believe that the joy derived from

hobbies

is subjective and largely contingent upon an individual’s choice of challenge

level

.

Firstly

, individuals have the autonomy to choose their

hobbies

, tailoring the

level

of

difficulty

to their preference. Whether to pursue or discontinue a challenging pastime is entirely up to them, allowing for flexibility in their engagement. If a

hobby

becomes overwhelming, one can always scale back the

difficulty

to restore enjoyment. Take playing chess,

for instance

. Enthusiasts can match against computer AI at varying levels of complexity, gradually increasing the challenge as they enhance their skills.

This

self-regulated progression ensures that the

hobby

remains both stimulating and enjoyable.

Conversely

, some individuals seek challenges in their

hobbies

as a means to combat monotony and foster personal growth. Remaining indefinitely at an elementary

level

can be unsatisfying and hinder the acquisition of new skills.

For instance

, hobbyist musicians often find joy in mastering increasingly complex pieces, which signifies progress and achievement. Admitting to having played an instrument might be disheartening.

Thus

, advancing in proficiency becomes a source of happiness and pride for many. In conclusion,

while

hobbies

vary greatly in nature and

difficulty

, personal enjoyment is ultimately determined by individual choice and preference. The freedom to modify the

level

of challenge in a

hobby

ensures that one can always find pleasure in the activity whether by advancing in complexity or savoring the comfort of simpler tasks.