Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Many individuals are of the opinion that cities should permit
spaces
for
graffiti
while
others argue that it should be prohibited.
This
essay will discuss both perspectives,
along with
presenting my opinion. On the one hand,
graffiti
is a form of self-expression and art. Cities providing several areas for
graffiti
can nurture creativity.
This
might cause magnificent artworks and bring colour and vibrancy to urban
spaces
.
Moreover
, these urban
spaces
might become
tourist
attractions.
As a result
, the welfare level of the city may experience a rise and the
tourist
revenues might increase.
For example
, in France, there is a famous
graffiti
artist named Banksy whose artwork has become one of the most famous
tourist
attractions in the entire country. I totally agree with
this
side, in my point of view, not only government should allow it, but it should support
graffiti
artists too.
On the other hand
, supporters of the other side claim that there are several causes of why it should be banned,
firstly
, not all
graffiti
is considered art, in fact, most of it is painted randomly.
Thus
, it can affect the general view of towns,
additionally
, individuals who do that are mostly careless about what they leave behind after they finish drawing.
As a result
, the image of neighbourhoods can be ruined.
Furthermore
, criminal gangs usually use
this
type of paint to communicate with their gang members or their enemies,
hence
, by allowing that, the government could be helping criminal activities and the crime level of the city might increase.
To conclude
, allowing
spaces
for
graffiti
might nurture the creativity level of the artists and
therefore
these places might become
tourist
attractions. But
also
it might cause a disturbing view in towns and help criminal gangs in different ways. Personally, I believe if
this
is allowed under limited circumstances, negative aspects can be solved and it can be beneficial for cities.
Submitted by edzcls on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure a clear distinction between introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion to improve logical structure.
coherence cohesion
Ensure the introduction and conclusion encapsulate the essay's key points and present a clear thesis statement and summary.
coherence cohesion
Develop each main point with adequate support and explanation to strengthen the argument.
task achievement
Address all parts of the task to provide a complete response to the prompt.
task achievement
Expand on ideas with clear, comprehensive development throughout the essay.
task achievement
Incorporate more relevant, specific examples to substantiate arguments.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban art
  • vandalism
  • vibrancy
  • aesthetic
  • decline
  • creative expression
  • cultural asset
  • legal ramifications
  • marginalized groups
  • community engagement
  • ethical considerations
  • gentrification
  • zoning regulations
  • public space
  • civic responsibility
  • curated walls
  • street artists
  • social commentary
  • property rights
  • anti-graffiti coatings
What to do next:
Look at other essays: