Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays,

due to

the rise in immigration jobs, an argument has come to some people's minds that these individuals should be obligated to

work

where they were trained;

while

others assume that they have the right to choose where they want to

work

.

This

essay will analyze both views and I will indicate my agreement with the latter. On the one hand, the first group may consider the fact that professionals have to use facilities and investment; to become doctors, engineers, etc. and

for

this

reason, they have to

work

in countries they used to

study

.

Thus

, a student, who gets a government scholarship to

study

, has to repay

this

investment.

For example

, in Thailand, the doctor’s internship, which

study

in the fourth year of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

university, has to

work

in the local hospitals to pay back;

otherwise

, they are obligated to pay back the whole money in case of going abroad and using their license.

On the other hand

, the second group has debated that human beings have the right to choose another country if they desire.

In addition

, they believe that being trained in that place means not having to be stuck in it again.

For instance

, the researchers show that more than 50% of students, who

study

in professional fields want to experience working in internationals.

Furthermore

, the student have the right to pick their own though it will increase the quality of their life. In conclusion,

although

there might be convincing reasons for remaining where you were educated, I believe that forbidding individuals from working where they demand, is not humanistic and logical.