Governments should spend time on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The dramatic shift in people's way of travelling has been intensely apparent throughout the century. Some people believe that the authority needs to prioritize the construction of railways, which will eventually raise the usage of public means of transportation rather than investing in road establishment.
This
will be proven by discussing a comparison of
London
's traffic before and after the construction of the underground
Metro
system
and the practical advantages of public vehicle enhancement.
Firstly
, taking a closer look at the oldest underground railroad in
London
, the biggest upside of it was how much it reduced the traffic congestion there. Prior to the
Metro
system
establishment, the citizens' housings were centred in the city, which caused an overcrowded urban area and neglected suburban environment.
Hence
, the governance and engineers invented the underground train to help them commute from the rural zone to the city where they worked.
Consequently
,
this
stubborn issue was successfully tackled,
thus
making
London
a pioneer of the
metro
system
.
Hence
, it is important for the governance to take the key takeaway from
London
's situation.
Secondly
, personal vehicles are prone to traffic congestion and expensive maintenance,
hence
the availability of railways may suppress the damages of
this
phenomenon.
For instance
, the certainty and easy access of trains will make trains a better alternative to travel. By using the train, people find out exactly when they will arrive,
not to mention
the cheap ticket compared to the increasing gas price. In conclusion, the success story of
London
's
Metro
system
and the practicality of public transport enrichment should be the strong reasons for
government
Add an article
the government
show examples
to direct the regulation into railways improvement.
Submitted by pink panther on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that paragraphs are well-organized with clear main ideas and appropriate supporting details. Consider using a range of cohesive devices to enhance connectivity.
task achievement
Address all parts of the task, ensuring that you develop your arguments comprehensively with relevant examples. In your conclusion, summarize your main points effectively to demonstrate a full response to the prompt.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: