Both government investment in public transport systems and reductions in public transport ticket prices will help to reduce transport pollution greatly. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that if the government provides more public
transportation
and lowers ticket prices,
this
will lead to a dramatic decrease in vehicle
pollution
in a city. I fully agree with the statement because I think using public
transportation
is one of the ways to improve environmental health.
To begin
with, adequate access to
transportation
with low prices is able to encourage the community to use public accommodation. If access is easy, citizens do not need to spend so much time learning the systems, and they will utilize public transport systems as the quickest way to go anywhere. Other than that, with cheaper cash, public
transportation
can be the most economical choice for folk who aren't likely to spend a lot of money on their transit.
For example
, in Jakarta, the time and money that people spend on the Transjakarta Bus is a lot less than if they have to drive their own cars. That's why transport with public conveyance is a relatively great deal for everyday routine.
Secondly
, the usage of public
transportation
helps to reduce carbon dioxide levels in the
air
. Exhaust fumes that are produced by fuel-powered vehicles emit carbon dioxide which causes
pollution
. Reducing the number of vehicles in the environment can help reduce
air
pollution
which causes many bad impacts, including for humans.
For example
, the level of
air
pollution
in Tokyo is lower than the measure of
air
pollution
in Jakarta
due to
the number of
transportation
.
Hence
, reducing the quantity of vehicles on the streets will
also
help to reduce transport
pollution
greatly.
To conclude
, I strongly believe that well-managed public
transportation
systems and reasonable ticket prices in every country will lessen the degree of
pollution
because public conveyance are great deal for everyday routine and helps to reduce carbon dioxide levels in the
air
.
Submitted by iamthenextawardee on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that your essay contains a clear central idea with each paragraph elaborating on this main point. Maintain a logical progression of ideas throughout, with each paragraph linking smoothly to the next.
coherence cohesion
Always begin with an engaging introduction that clearly states your position and end with a concise conclusion that summarizes your main points and restates your stance.
task achievement
Back up your ideas with specific examples and ensure that they are directly relevant to the main points you are trying to make. Avoid making general statements without supporting them with details.
task achievement
Fully answer the question posed by clearly stating your opinion and discussing both sides of the argument if necessary. Make sure that your ideas are not only clear and comprehensive but are also well-developed and expanded upon within the essay.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainable transport
  • carbon footprint
  • mass transit
  • subsidization
  • fare reduction
  • environmental impact
  • urban planning
  • public policy
  • commuter behavior
  • infrastructural development
  • economic efficiency
  • equitable access
  • lifestyle shift
  • congestion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: