People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rapid development of the world as a whole, it is easy to speculate that humanity's
overall
life
quality in the current times is superior to that of the past. Technology has enabled us to live life
to the fullest extent, with convenient smart devices facilitating us with every aspect of growth. However
, this
doesn't come free of problems, causing a significant crowd to argue that life
was inherently better in the past. This
essay will evaluate the issue above, as well as
give a personal opinion on the matter.
On one hand, better development of science means that humans do not have to worry about illnesses. Moreover
, problem-solving technologies such
as smart homes are making our day-to-day lives so much more convenient, allowing us to enjoy life
hassle-free. But as always, every good thing comes with its own set of complications. These technologies cost an arm and a leg to buy - meaning you would have to work extremely hard to be able to afford them. In the ever-growing world with developing economies, people are being forced to work harder - and with that comes less time to enjoy life
. Furthermore
, the industrialization era wrecked our environment so much that it is starting to affect our health and daily lives.
On the other hand
, the aforementioned troubles were non-existent during the pre-21st century era. According to
historians, people in the past didn't have to worry much about working since necessities were relatively affordable at the time. What's more, pollution was not a big deal in pre-industrialization eras. Back then
, the air was fresh, lakes were unbelievably clear, trees grew all over the place, and life
was peaceful. However
, without technologies, diseases and plagues were spreading all across the globe, and there were no cures for such
diseases. Also
, people had to deal with daily trouble that can be eliminated with modern technology suggesting that life
in the past was quite inconvenient. From my perspective, this
alone is a large enough issue that it completely outweigh
the advantages.
To summarize, it is hard to decide which era has better Change the verb form
outweighs
life
quality for humans since each one has its own assets and liabilities. It is important to mention that as technology keeps advancing and economies are growing, our life
quality might significantly improve in the near future, settling the debate once and for all.Submitted by walker57842 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph clearly introduces, supports, and concludes a single main idea.
coherence cohesion
Include a clear topic sentence at the beginning of each paragraph to establish its main idea and how it contributes to your argument.
coherence cohesion
Make certain that each point is well supported with relevant examples or explanations to strengthen your argument.
task achievement
Strive to maintain a balance between both sides of the argument before presenting your own opinion, to fully address the task.
task achievement
Use a wider range of vocabulary and sentence structures to improve overall clarity and articulate ideas more precisely.
task achievement
Incorporate more detailed and specific examples to reinforce your points and lend more credence to your argument.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?