Governments should spend money on railways rather than Roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is a common belief that Governments should develop
railways
more than
roads
. I partially agree with
this
point of view. A discussion of
this
issue
as well as
my thoughts, will be highlighted in the write-up. On the one hand, there are a few reasons why the government should spend more funds on
railways
instead
of
roads
.
Firstly
,
railways
have various uses for mankind.
This
is because
railways
can be a transportation for
people
.
For example
,
people
could travel from one city to another city by train, which is faster and more convenient than driving a car.
Moreover
, investing in
railways
also
benefits the cargo industry.
This
is
due to
the fact that some massive items cannot be delivered by plane or car.
For instance
, a circus cannot move effectively by carrying a lot of animals
such
as giraffes.
Thus
, a railway can be more flexible than other transports.
On the other hand
, the needs of road users cannot be neglected.
To begin
with,
people
have the right to choose what transportation they want. To be more specific, in urban cities,
people
usually take a bus or drive by themselves.
Consequently
, the need to use the
roads
in cities is greater than the
railways
.
In addition
, in some countries, there is more than one way to use the
roads
.
In other words
, they can be used in a competition.
For example
, in HONG KONG, there is a marathon that crosses many main
roads
in the city and tunnels.
Therefore
, these activities must be on a flat road
instead
of
railways
. In conclusion,
while
it is apparent that
railways
can make an easy way to travel somewhere and deliver the cargo, it is
deniable
Correct your spelling
undeniable
show examples
that
roads
are more necessary in urban life. In my opinion, I believe that there are necessary to spend money to maintain
railways
and
roads
.
Besides
,
railways
and
roads
can be a mixture to use.
Submitted by 68aimmia on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
To improve logical structure, make sure to clearly connect paragraphs and ideas with cohesive devices and ensure smooth transitions between points.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are present but can be improved by stating your position more clearly and summarizing all main points discussed.
coherence cohesion
While main points are supported, work on developing your arguments further and provide a more in-depth analysis of each point.
task achievement
Make sure that your essay fully addresses all parts of the task. It should be clear to what extent you agree or disagree throughout the essay, not just at the end.
task achievement
Elaborate on your ideas with a more detailed explanation to ensure that they are comprehensive and fully developed.
task achievement
Include more relevant and specific examples to support your arguments. These examples should clearly illustrate the points you're making and be directly related to the topic.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: