governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Rail

lines

are to people what life jackets are to swimmers. It is argued that policymakers should invest in

rail

lines

instead

of

roads

. I completely agree with

this

matter and the reasons for

this

issue are discussed below.

Rail

lines

introduce several benefits in terms of the environment.

It is clear that

trains and subways are more environmentally friendly in comparison to

roads

and they produce less emission

due to

the fact that

rail

lines

use electric power

such

as wind or solar power in most cases, as a source of energy which is completely renewable without any disadvantage to the environment,

instead

of the gasoline which is absolutely harmful not only for the society but

also

for the environment. the classical example is a city in Japan which replaced most

roads

with

rail

lines

and it's residents experienced a sharp decrease in air pollution after a year.

Rail

lines

prevent road congestion as well. It is obvious that improving

rail

Correct article usage

the rail

show examples

line's infrastructure can address the issue of traffic jams on streets and motivate people to take advantage of safe and fast

rail

lines

for commuting

instead

of driving private cars on

roads

.

Although

some believe that building railways is impossible in suburbs and it costs a lot of expenses for policymakers, I personally assume that it is worth spending money constructing

rail

lines

and it is possible in most cases. In the final analysis, for all the apparent greatness of

rail

lines

, it would be in our interests if policymakers consider more money for building railways. If

rail

lines

are,

as a result

, like life jackets,

then

they can save people.