It has been suggested that cars and public transport should be banned from city centres and only bicycles be allowed instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that automobiles and public transportation should be eliminated in metropolitan areas and replaced
them
Correct pronoun usage
apply
show examples
with bicycles.
This
essay completely disagrees with
this
statement because cars and mass transit,
such
as buses and railways, offer more convenience and provide larger storage than bikes. Automobiles and public transportation are more convenient. They can be used during bad weather.
Also
, they can provide direct routes to different destinations and they will not take too much time. Unlike bikes, they can be used in long-distance travel. People will be exhausted if they use a bike within the city.
For example
, the main city of the Philippines is Metro Manila and it is composed of 17 districts. It will be too exhausting if the person will go from one district to another.
Thus
, banning vehicles in cities can have more disadvantages than its advantages.
In addition
to that, cars and mass transportation provide larger storage. Individuals do not need to take multiple travel in order to get groceries.
Also
, it can carry multiple passengers at a time. People usually travel to cities because they have huge shopping malls.
For instance
, Hong Kong is well-known for its shopping centres,
however
, if vehicles are not allowed there, there is a high chance that they will not shop a lot because they will not be able to carry it.
Thus
, it can decrease the number of visitors and their income will decline as well.
Hence
, cars and mass transit are very important , especially in urban areas. In conclusion, despite the significant impact of bikes on the environment, I completely disagree with the notion of banning them because it does not have huge compartments and does not offer the same convenience as private vehicles, buses, and railways.
Submitted by yoko.onerom on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
To improve your Task Achievement score, ensure that your essay fully addresses all parts of the task. While you have argued against banning cars and public transport from city centres, consider exploring the potential benefits of the proposal to provide a more balanced view. This could involve discussing the environmental and health benefits of increased bicycle use, even if your final position disagrees with the suggestion.
Coherence and Cohesion
To enhance Coherence and Cohesion, work on the logical flow of ideas between paragraphs. Transition phrases can help link ideas more smoothly. Additionally, consider varying your sentence structures to avoid repetition and make the essay more engaging for the reader.
General Advice
Utilize a wider range of vocabulary and sentence structures to express your arguments more effectively. This will also demonstrate your language proficiency to the examiner and can help improve your scores across all criteria.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • congestion
  • air pollution
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • traffic
  • improve
  • viable
  • population
  • investment
  • infrastructure
  • policy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: