In
this
contemporary world, donating a certain Linking Words
amount
of money to charitable trusts become common. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the statement because mandating a fixed Use synonyms
amount
for everyone will be seen as an infringement of their privacy and Use synonyms
this
process will lose its value Linking Words
due to
external compulsion.
The primary reason is, that people do not have a steady income and most of them are dependent on daily wages. Linking Words
Due to
the lack of unemployment in society, youngsters are running behind jobs to help their families and in Linking Words
such
Linking Words
cases
Add a comma
cases,
this
will cause distress and no one should intervene in their financial situations.Linking Words
For example
, In some parts of India, workers get their payments delayed and in Linking Words
such
cases, fixed payments perhaps get missed. Linking Words
Hence
, making Linking Words
such
amendments will not definitely suit them.
The second main reason to avoid mandating the target Linking Words
amount
for charitable organisations is, that Use synonyms
this
compulsion changes the positive mindset of the persons who are ready to provide support and help the nation. Linking Words
For instance
, sometimes people have to spend Linking Words
lump
sum Correct article usage
a lump
amount
Use synonyms
to
their families in case of any medical emergencies and unexpected educational expenses which will result in missing the deadline. Change preposition
on
Thus
, Forcing someone to provide charity in Linking Words
this
kind of situation will change their mindset towards their handout for non-profit organisations.
In conclusion, I wholeheartedly disagree with the compulsion of donations to charitable institutions because it apparently affects the individual's financial circumstances and modifies the nature of embracing the philanthropy act.Linking Words
chandralekha1993