Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
In
this
Linking Words
contemporary world, donating a certain
amount
Use synonyms
of money to charitable trusts become common. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the statement because mandating a fixed
amount
Use synonyms
for everyone will be seen as an infringement of their privacy and
this
Linking Words
process will lose its value
due to
Linking Words
external compulsion. The primary reason is, that people do not have a steady income and most of them are dependent on daily wages.
Due to
Linking Words
the lack of unemployment in society, youngsters are running behind jobs to help their families and in
such
Linking Words
cases
Add a comma
cases,
show examples
this
Linking Words
will cause distress and no one should intervene in their financial situations.
For example
Linking Words
, In some parts of India, workers get their payments delayed and in
such
Linking Words
cases, fixed payments perhaps get missed.
Hence
Linking Words
, making
such
Linking Words
amendments will not definitely suit them. The second main reason to avoid mandating the target
amount
Use synonyms
for charitable organisations is, that
this
Linking Words
compulsion changes the positive mindset of the persons who are ready to provide support and help the nation.
For instance
Linking Words
, sometimes people have to spend
lump
Correct article usage
a lump
show examples
sum
amount
Use synonyms
to
Change preposition
on
show examples
their families in case of any medical emergencies and unexpected educational expenses which will result in missing the deadline.
Thus
Linking Words
, Forcing someone to provide charity in
this
Linking Words
kind of situation will change their mindset towards their handout for non-profit organisations. In conclusion, I wholeheartedly disagree with the compulsion of donations to charitable institutions because it apparently affects the individual's financial circumstances and modifies the nature of embracing the philanthropy act.
Submitted by chandralekha1993 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Coherence & Cohesion
To enhance coherence and cohesion, transition between paragraphs and ideas more smoothly, using a richer variety of linking words. Aim for a natural flow from one argument to the next.
Task Achievement
Clarify and elaborate your main ideas further. While your stance is clear, deepening your explanations and adding more nuanced arguments could strengthen your essay.
Task Achievement
Include more specific, real-world examples to support your arguments. This would illustrate your points more vividly and make your arguments more convincing.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Economic equality
  • Wealth gap
  • Redistributing resources
  • Social responsibility
  • Mandatory donations
  • Financial strain
  • Voluntary donations
  • Morality
  • Ethics
  • Efficient use of resources
  • Sporadic contributions
  • Implementation challenges
  • Compliance
  • Fixed amount
What to do next:
Look at other essays: