Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that developed

countries

should accommodate more

refugees

and assist them with their food and housing.

This

essay completely disagrees with

this

statement because it results in the rise of

crime

rate and

also

being a

tax

burden for taxpayers. Accommodating more

refugees

for humanity is not necessary because it often results in the rise of

crime

.

Refugees

are not proven that they are completely clear on their

crime

record and it is not clear that they have enough skill to survive in new circumstances. It is clear when they fail to settle in without any techniques to live in a nation, it leads to them being involved the economic crimes or violent crimes.

For example

, France is one of the

countries

that accept numerous

refugees

for humanity and currently is suffering from crimes that occurred

due to

refugees

. Another reason why rich

countries

do not need to have

refugees

is the

tax

burden.

It is clear that

when the government provides people subsidies for living costs, the subsidies will be paid from the budget from the

tax

which the taxpayer paid. It is certainly to increase the

tax

rate.

For instance

, the U.K. Kept receiving more and more

refugees

and they now face huge financial plan issues even though they are one of the richest

countries

in the world. So they have no choice but to avoid increasing taxes to support

refugees

. In conclusion, the richer nations totally do not have any duty to receive unlimited

refugees

because

refugees

could be a reason for higher

crime

rates,

furthermore

, the developed

countries

could face serious financial issues in helping

refugees

which causes the parliament to make a decision to increase taxpayers'

tax