Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Poverty

is a fundamental problem faced by most countries in the world, especially the developing ones. The developed nations often give them help to solve

this

problem in the form of money.

This

pattern of funding has not changed since a long time ago and I think there should be a transformation to resolve

poverty

by making debts not only in the form of financial, but

also

non-financial. Since underdevelopment in the form of

poverty

is a systemic problem, it is needed to make some reformations in many aspects.

For example

, increase the amount of job vacancies to absorb more people, so the unemployment rate becomes lower and poor people could be reduced.

However

, third-world countries have to struggle to attract some investors to come to their homelands. The authority plays an important role here. They should make a policy which is beneficial for foreign investors.

This

is the first alternative to change financial aid to investments. Another option that should be considered by rich states to help is they can give the poor infrastructure help. Delivering public transportation is much needed

Change preposition

by

show examples

for

Change preposition

by

show examples

a lot of people. They need cheaper access. So, if they want to go somewhere they do not have to book expensive tickets.

This

will be very helpful. In conclusion,

poverty

is a very broad trouble. It is more than about sending money. The lack of resources becomes the main key need to answer. Investments

as well as

infrastructures are the main alternatives the government could focus on.