Some people think that (all) countries should produce foods their population eats and import less food as much as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

One school of thought holds that nations should try to become
food
-independent.
While
acknowledging the reason for
this
thinking, I would argue that it is impractical in many parts of the world. On the one hand, it is understandable why certain individuals advocate that countries should strive for
food
autonomy and reduce their dependence on
food
imports. The key rationale is that improving domestic
food
production can lead to employment opportunities, thereby curbing unemployment.
This
can be seen in Vietnam, where an emphasis on agricultural development has ensured year-round production, creating thousands of jobs for the local residents and preventing jobless periods.
In addition
to
this
, minimizing
food
imports can aid in environmental protection.
This
is because it can lead to reduced
food
miles, which would be synonymous with lower levels of carbon dioxide emitted from
food
transportation.
On the other hand
, I am convinced that solely depending on domestic
food
production is far from a realistic goal for every country. To be more specific, weather conditions in many regions are simply not compatible with developing agricultural practices. Japan is a case in point. Its infertile soil,
coupled with
hostile climates, severely limits its agricultural capacity, making self-sufficiency a hardly attainable goal. By the same token, in light of unprecedented flooding crises and devastating droughts, it would be virtually impossible for South Sudan to produce enough
food
for its citizenry. For
such
countries, avoiding
food
imports could actually be tantamount to causing national
food
shortages. In conclusion,
while
there are justifications for supporting the policy of
food
self-reliance, I would contend that it is not a feasible option for all countries. Particularly in regions where natural conditions are unfavourable for agriculture, importing foods remains an indispensable means to ensure national
food
security.
Submitted by nguyettran.work on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: