There should be strict laws banning people from taking photographs of people under 18 in order to protect young celebrities and the children of celebrities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, the question of whether strict
laws
should be enacted to prohibit the photography of individuals under 18, particularly young celebrities and children of celebrities, raises complex ethical and legal considerations. In this
essay, I will examine the arguments both in favor
of and against Change the spelling
favour
such
legislation.
On one hand, proponents of strict laws
argue that they are essential for safeguarding the privacy and well-being of young individuals, especially those thrust into the public eye due to
their celebrity status or familial ties. Firstly
, minors
, particularly those in the spotlight, deserve protection from intrusive media scrutiny that can negatively impact their development and mental health. In other words
, constant surveillance and invasion of privacy can lead to undue stress, exploitation, and even harassment. Secondly
, children of celebrities are entitled to a normal childhood free from the pressures of fame and public scrutiny, and strict laws
can help shield them from unwanted attention and exploitation.
On the other hand
, opponents of such
laws
contend that they may infringe upon freedom of expression and the public's right to information. Firstly
, photography is often considered a form of artistic expression and a means of documenting public life, and overly restrictive laws
could impede legitimate journalistic and creative activities. In other words
, limiting the ability to photograph minors
in public spaces may have unintended consequences for freedom of speech and the press. Secondly
, enforcing such
laws
could pose significant logistical challenges and raise concerns about selective enforcement and censorship.
In conclusion, while
the protection of minors
, especially those in high-profile families, is undoubtedly important, the implementation of strict laws
banning photography of individuals under 18 requires careful consideration of competing interests and potential consequences. Therefore
, I believe that while
measures to safeguard the privacy and well-being of minors
are necessary, any legislation in this
regard should strike a delicate balance between protecting minors
' rights and upholding principles of freedom of expression and the public's right to information.Submitted by Leb.7149 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Your essay provides a well-rounded approach to the topic, but to improve task response, ensure you clearly state your position early on. While you explore both sides of the argument, your own stance should be evident to guide the reader throughout the essay. Additionally, consider concluding your essay with a stronger, more definitive stance.
coherence and cohesion
To enhance coherence and cohesion, focus on clearer transitions between paragraphs and within them. Use phrases that explicitly signal the beginning of your argument, a counterargument, and your conclusion. This will help the reader follow your line of reasoning more easily.
task response
Your essay would benefit from more specific examples to support your arguments. While the general arguments are strong, real-world instances or hypothetical scenarios can make your points more relatable and compelling. This specificity also helps in illustrating a deeper understanding of the topic.