It has been suggested that cars and public transport should be banned from city centres and only bicycles be allowed instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has been recommended by some that
cars
and public transportation should be banned from urban centres. Alternatively, they propose that just bikes should be permitted in the area. In my opinion,
this
suggestion is not sustainable as it would not only make central urban zones less accessible for those who have limited motion but
also
would be laborious for those who use public
transport
to move across the
city
. Accessibility is one of the most vital aspects associated with a well-developed metropolitan area. With
this
in mind, when not allowing
cars
or public
transport
in the
city
's main location, the access of many
citizens
would be significantly limited.
For instance
, individuals with disabilities or aged people who can’t move their legs properly or walk long distances
due to
diseases would not be able to reach central facilities easily.
Additionally
, people with limited mobility may have difficulties riding bicycles,
thus
this
alternative way of
transport
would not be effective for those groups. Despite that banning
cars
and public ways of transportation would help to ease traffic jams, a
city
centre is usually a key zone where public
transport
options are concentrated.
This
means that many
citizens
use public
transport
to move to different suburbs,
hence
prohibiting
cars
, buses, and trains, would make their lives harder.
For example
, in Sydney, a big metropolitan
city
, people from different suburbs travel to the centre to access buses and trains to other parts of the
city
when travelling to university or work.
This
is planned to make
citizens
' travel journeys around other parts of the
city
easy and efficient. In conclusion, I believe that not allowing
cars
, trains, and buses in urban central zones, and permitting only bikes, is not an effective suggestion.
This
disagreement is because it would make
city
centres less accessible and public
transport
travel journeys more challenging for
citizens
.
Submitted by betinhaa00 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
Work on integrating more diverse and specific examples to support your points. This will not only make your argument stronger but also more engaging for the reader.
Coherence and Cohesion
Consider varying your sentence structures and using a broader range of linking phrases to enhance flow and coherence.
Task Achievement
To elevate your essay further, try to explore the topic from multiple perspectives, not just the drawbacks, but also potential benefits, even if you disagree with the proposition. This can provide a more rounded argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • congestion
  • air pollution
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • traffic
  • improve
  • viable
  • population
  • investment
  • infrastructure
  • policy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: