In the past, buildings often reflected the culture of a society but today all modern buildings look alike and cities throughout the world are becoming more and more similar. Why is this the cause? Is it a good thing or a bad thing?

Presently, there is an increasing number of modern buildings being identical in all parts of the cities worldwide,
while
old-fashioned buildings symbolizing societal culture no longer exist, which derives from the international cooperation for global issues.
This
writer,
however
, believes that
this
would have a profound and adverse influence on nations’ traditional diversity. It must be acknowledged that the integration of cutting-edge building formations helps authorities solve many problems based on overpopulation and unemployment.
This
is especially so if population growth and the number of unemployed people place a serious burden on land and housing that only high-rise buildings,
such
as skyscrapers, can handle.
As a result
, more and more people own their accommodation and have an official occupation, whilst constructing more similar superstructures in the urbanizational era. Take China as a pertinent example, where most architectural styles are homogenized by state-of-the-art methods from foreign nations during the globalization period for working purposes and housing zones.
Nevertheless
,
this
phenomenon is detrimental to the variety of national cultures.
Although
some people agree with the erection of high-rise architecture, the majority of citizens desire to maintain a tradition
that is
distinctive from another community. If all of the infrastructures were identical to each other between nations, the culture would lack enhancement and richness, causing the disappearance shortly without any solutions to preservation. Vietnamese houses are prime examples, where the plenty of thatched cottages in the past do not exist anymore because of no conservation and made way for the fashionable and large building structures in the urban and willing to enlarge in the rural designated areas. To recapitulate, the circumstance of modern society improved by the innovative architectural building stems from international collaboration with the aim of dealing with the global populous problems.
Nonetheless
, spending money on these new building constructions brings a severe threat to the traditional variety.
Submitted by Nghỉ hè vui vẻ cả nhà on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
To improve your score in Task Achievement, ensure that your response fully addresses all parts of the task. While you have provided some relevant examples and a clear stance, expanding on these with more depth and detail, especially in the discussion of whether the trend is good or bad, could enhance your essay.
Coherence and Cohesion
For Coherence and Cohesion, you've structured your essay well with a logical flow. To further improve, consider varying your linking words more and ensuring paragraphs flow smoothly from one to the next. Additionally, including a brief summary of your main points in the conclusion could strengthen your essay's cohesion.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: