Some people think that only the government can make significant changes in society, while others think that individuals can have a lot of influence. What is your opinion?

Management of

societies

to control populations are dynamic,

hence

changes are constantly required in order to guarantee equality.

Then

, some proponents argue that governments are in charge of improvements among communities,

while

opponents believe that people are

also

responsible for them. I staunchly agree that either governors or individuals must take care of their countries by working as peers. In my contention, I support both ideas.

To begin

with, it is well-known that governments make rules and outlaw many others regularly in response to crimes, social issues, etc.

Then

, legislators try to control those detriments by declaring policies,

thus

avoiding or decreasing either major or minor crime.

For example

, "Transmilenio" is the least transportation used in Bogota, where hundreds of people are commuting every day and they should pay a minimum fare that was imposed by The Government.

Otherwise

, in case of not paying, there are some fines and punishments.

Hence

, politicians establish basic regulations to maintain basic order.

However

, education and high values are required in all

societies

because individual manners guarantee peaceful and empathetic communities.

Furthermore

, children should be taught not only by parents but

also

by teachers about the importance of following rules and being respectful.

For example

, in the same case in the aforementioned system of transportation, it has been proved that more than 60% of youngsters avoid paying the fee.

Consequently

, there should be a balance between

societies

and governments.

To sum up

, creating and improving peaceful

societies

with ethics and morals is a combined effort that should be done by ministers and persons, and both should recognize their importance and accomplish their respective functions.