Some environmentalists have advocated building wildlife sanctuaries to protect endangered species. Discuss the Advantages and disadvantages of doing this.

It is important to save wildlife from being endangered. A few environmentalists have taken action to protect species from extinct. I will discuss both points of view by including examples. On the one hand, some environmental scientists believe that

animals

kept in

zoos

are very safe.

Moreover

, it helps them with better medical facilities and keeps them safe from diseases

as well as

other

animals

and hunters.

For example

, in the UK there are hundreds of

zoos

to protect the wildlife and give them better breeding environments. They think that that way they can save any

animals

from extinction

such

as the Java Tiger. Some environmental specialists

also

add that in the future number of

animals

will increase and they can introduce new

animals

through

this

method.

On the other hand

, others think that

this

method will have more drawbacks.

Also

, it will destroy biodiversity and their food chains.

Animals

are habituated in wild environments, if we keep them in

zoos

they will lose their natural activities like breeding and eating.

For Instance

,

last

year a study was conducted by Cambridge University on how effects

zoos

on wildlife.

Furthermore

, those

animals

have been living for millions of years in the wild. when species are living in the wild they can fulfill their physical needs they can go anywhere they want. In conclusion, I would say that both have good points and drawbacks.

Animals

have lived wild for millions of years they have food chins and survival abilities it has been developed over the thousands of years. I think species in the wild would be better and healthier.