It is important to save wildlife from being endangered. A few environmentalists have taken action to protect species from extinct. I will discuss both points of view by including examples.
On the one hand, some environmental scientists believe that
animals
kept in Use synonyms
zoos
are very safe. Use synonyms
Moreover
, it helps them with better medical facilities and keeps them safe from diseases Linking Words
as well as
other Linking Words
animals
and hunters. Use synonyms
For example
, in the UK there are hundreds of Linking Words
zoos
to protect the wildlife and give them better breeding environments. They think that that way they can save any Use synonyms
animals
from extinction Use synonyms
such
as the Java Tiger. Some environmental specialists Linking Words
also
add that in the future number of Linking Words
animals
will increase and they can introduce new Use synonyms
animals
through Use synonyms
this
method.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, others think that Linking Words
this
method will have more drawbacks. Linking Words
Also
, it will destroy biodiversity and their food chains. Linking Words
Animals
are habituated in wild environments, if we keep them in Use synonyms
zoos
they will lose their natural activities like breeding and eating. Use synonyms
For Instance
, Linking Words
last
year a study was conducted by Cambridge University on how effects Linking Words
zoos
on wildlife. Use synonyms
Furthermore
, those Linking Words
animals
have been living for millions of years in the wild. when species are living in the wild they can fulfill their physical needs they can go anywhere they want.
In conclusion, I would say that both have good points and drawbacks. Use synonyms
Animals
have lived wild for millions of years they have food chins and survival abilities it has been developed over the thousands of years. I think species in the wild would be better and healthier.Use synonyms
shahjalal