Some people believe that violent media directly results in violent behavior. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The severity of

violence

has been highlighted over the past decades. From

this

aspect, questions about whether violent

media

directly results in violent

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

are raised. In my opinion, violent

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

is caused by the channels to some extent. Irrefutably, individuals can learn about violent methods.

This

is because, with the prevalence of

media

, a wide range of

channels

Change the noun form

channel

show examples

contents serve specific ways of

violence

and inform detailed reasons for situations.

This

obviously leads to the curiosity of imitation and

this

in turn encourages them to make a fault situation by force. What is more,

although

the entertainment of

media

cannot be ignored, the lightness of

violence

is instilled by

media

. To exemplify, plenty of action films include

scenes

of severe

violence

for enjoyment and general drama programs illustrate a man's character who makes fights as manly and fearless.

This

,

therefore

, results in incorrect awareness about

violence

.

Nevertheless

, the public can distinguish what is right from wrong.

In other words

, since a plethora of contents associated with

violence

offer the caution of alarming

scenes

, they sufficiently understand fiction

scenes

and the risk of imitation so, they barely like to follow violent

scenes

. To recapitulate, the public can distinguish what is right from wrong but individuals can learn about violent methods and the lightness of

violence

is instilled by

media

.

Thus

, violent

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

is caused by the channels.