Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There have been conflicting views on whether it is necessary to watch a
movie
in a theatre or if digital devices are adequate. In my opinion, I believe that the immersive effects of
movie
halls are far better than digital devices to enjoy the time. On the one hand, those who prefer to watch
films
on their phone or tablets can have access to the videotape at any time and anywhere.
Moreover
, a yearly subscription to Netflix and Prime Video is equal to the amount of two theatre tickets. Which provides them access to various platforms.
In addition
, watching
movies
on their handy gadgets allocates them personal space without any disturbance.
Therefore
, watching motion
films
on cell phones and iPads is increasing
due to
its convenience and cost-effectiveness.
For example
, most students prefer to use these devices to watch
films
during their commute to college or home to relax, because of their busy schedule.
On the other hand
, it is seen that the majority of Individuals love to view motion pictures on the big screen to experience immersive effects. People get a better chance to absorb fantastic views of feature
films
on the big screen.
Furthermore
, the big screen and the sound effects of the
movie
hall play a vital role in enhancing the enjoyment of video. Humans can clearly see, the elements of the picture,
such
as different camera angles, costumes, acting skills and much more.
For instance
, most cineplexes now offer 3D or 4D view
movies
to make watching more realistic and feel like people are part of the motion
movie
. Viewing
films
in the cinema halls brings the opportunity for people to get a break from their hectic schedules. In conclusion, it is noted that both views have their own perspectives on
movie
-watching. Small gadgets allow humans to watch
movies
at a low cost.
However
, the experience of watching
movies
in cinema halls can not be compared with mobile as it is
a
Change the article
apply
show examples
far more engaging.
Submitted by manipreet1217 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that your essay has a clear structure with distinct paragraphs for introduction, body, and conclusion. It's evident in your work, but keep focusing on transitions for smoother flow.
task achievement
Expand on your examples by providing more detailed scenarios or data to support your claims. While you have provided examples, adding depth could make your arguments more compelling.
coherence cohesion
Work on refining your essay for minor grammatical errors and enhancing sentence variety for a more engaging read.
task achievement
You've successfully discussed both views and given your opinion, maintaining a balanced approach throughout the essay.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are clearly marked and effectively encapsulate the essay's main points. Great job!
task achievement
You've utilized relevant examples to support your arguments, which helps in illustrating your points vividly.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Convenience
  • Mobile Viewing
  • Cost-efficient
  • Time-efficient
  • Personalized experience
  • Immersive
  • Cinematic experience
  • Surround sound
  • Collective experience
  • Technical superiority
  • Sensory experience
  • Social hubs
  • Cultural events
  • Distractions
  • Preservation
  • Filmmaking art
  • Cinematographic nuances
What to do next:
Look at other essays: