Some people think that cars should be banned from city centers to reduce pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
As
pollution
has harmed our environment, it is essential for
people
to find a way to measure
this
issue. Some
people
argue that one method to do it is by banning
car
usage from city centres. In some conditions, I agree with
this
statement and the reasons will be explained in
this
essay.
To begin
with, there are some reasons to ban
cars
from city centres.
Firstly
, private
cars
are known as the second cause of air
pollution
after the industrial sector.
However
, running the industrial sector is inevitable in order to serve human needs,
while
people
can
use
public transport, including MRT, LRT, or bus,
instead
of private ones.
Secondly
, the manufacturing of private
cars
itself has contributed to
pollution
, since it spends an enormous amount of electricity that might be produced from coal.
Hence
, banning private
car
use
in city centres will significantly reduce
pollution
.
In addition
to that, stopping
cars
should be followed by the improvement of public
transportation
facilities. It is essential for the governments to provide a better public
transportation
facility.
For instance
, upgrading and adding the bus or train units, or improving the security in each station will significantly attract the society to
use
them. By serving the citizens with better public
transportation
facilities,
people
will find it comfortable and secure to shift to
this
facility.
To sum up
, since private
car
use
and production emits a large amount of pollutants, it is important to ban private
car
use
and move to public
transportation
such
as buses, LRT, or MRT.
Nevertheless
, it should be followed by the improvement of public
transportation
itself.
Submitted by serlyayus on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Specific Examples
Consider adding more specific examples to strengthen your main points and make your argument more convincing. Detailed instances or statistics could enhance the relevance and impact of your arguments.
Transitions
Ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs for improved readability. While you have a solid structure, using more varied transitional phrases can enhance coherence.
Argument Support
While your introduction and conclusion effectively set the topic and summarize your stance, ensure every paragraph directly supports your viewpoint for a stronger argumentative structure.
Introduction & Conclusion
You effectively outlined your main arguments and succinctly summarized them in your introduction and conclusion, which aids in task relevance and coherence.
Logical Structure
Your essay demonstrates a good logical structure, allowing readers to follow your argument flow with ease.
Understanding of Issue
The discussion on the need for better public transportation facilities as a complement to banning cars illustrates a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban environment
  • air pollution
  • noise pollution
  • public transportation
  • non-motorized means
  • traffic congestion
  • green spaces
  • pedestrian areas
  • local economy
  • mobility
  • rely on
  • robust
  • infrastructure
  • inconvenience
What to do next:
Look at other essays: