Technology is becoming progressively universal. In the fullness of time, classroom teachers will be totally substituted for technology. Analyse the two sides of this argument.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
In
this
present world, the usage of automation is constantly on the rise. Even classrooms are among the many places that enjoy the usage and benefits of technology. The argument that the classroom workforce will be totally substituted for automation is a controversy
that is
both agreed upon and disagreed with by many. The two sides of
this
disagreement will be thoroughly analysed and discussed in
this
essay before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
Firstly
, the advancement rate at which automation is capable of mimicking the physical and psychological abilities of humans is quite remarkable.
For instance
, the Honda robot Asimov has a movable body and can manipulate objects just as perfectly as humans.
Thus
the prospect of machinery being used to teach students in the school is considerable.
This
is why it can be argued that faculty could be totally substituted for robots.
Nevertheless
, a robotic teacher made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its students.
For instance
, it is widely known that kids need to be thoroughly watched by their crew to be sure that they take their classwork seriously and do not fool around when classes are going on. Sadly,
this
is a task robotic team will be incapable of carrying out.
Therefore
,
this
makes it clear that professors will never be totally substituted for technology. To summarise, the two sides of the quarrel concerning the prospect of the robotic team in school have strong support.
However
, after a thorough analysis of both sides,
it is clear that
the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. It is
therefore
predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of
this
, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.
Submitted by praneeth2094 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
Ensure to develop your arguments with more diversified and detailed examples to strengthen your analysis.
Coherence and Cohesion
Work on varying your sentence structures and incorporating a wider range of linking words for smoother transitions between ideas.
Coherence & Cohesion
You provided a clear introduction and conclusion, effectively framing the discussion.
Task Achievement
Your essay addresses both sides of the argument, demonstrating a balanced analysis of the topic.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: