Students should pay the full cost of their own study because university education benefits individual rather than society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whether

students

need to cover all of their tertiary

education’s

Change noun form

education

show examples

fees

due to

individual benefits rather than social advantages or not is a controversial debate. The writer disagrees with

this

notion as authorities or paying for a part of the course alleviates the financial burden and improves economic potential. One of the core reasons why the government should be responsible for a segment of the university's costs is that it will support the

students

’ finances, especially those who are underprivileged.

This

is

due to

the fact that the cost of university is usually expensive and exponentially rises after each semester, despite the fact that many

students

have small budgets, which leads them to accept a loan that they will repay for many years after graduating.

As a result

, subsidizing a portion of the price can help the

students

focus on their studies

as well as

contribute adequately to society later on, ensuring a wealthy community. When it comes to partly covering the university's charge, there is no doubt that it improves the

overall

tuition level of the residents.

In other words

, it gives citizens access to tertiary education, which enhances the possibility of well-paid jobs and eases the intricate unemployment problems remaining in the population.

Consequently

, increasing the capital of the country and prompting the authorities to allocate money to upgrading the service industry

along with

urban development. Take Vietnam as a prime example, whose capital has seen a massive economic improvement when the government promises to aid 20% of the total university’s price. In conclusion, aiding the university’s

students

in terms of money assists in reducing the financial problems of poverty

as well as

boosting the country’s economy. 0