Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to question and offer criticism on their teachers. Others think this will you lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
#people #quality #school #students #offer #criticism #teachers #loss #respect #discipline #classroom
It is often believed that
students
should be encouraged to be critical of teachers
for the advancement of learning quality while
other people are concerned about it leading to the loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. I partially agree with the former, for a positive attitude toward learning allows them to be more independent thinkers regardless of the potentially hostile relationships between teachers
and students
.
On the one hand, students
' critical attitudes should be encouraged as they are more likely to internalize various ideas to themselves. In other words
, they are often able to increase their understanding by altering their perspectives and making new discoveries. For instance
, a movie called "three idiots" depicts a male student who often criticizes professors but finds a complex mechanism of mathematics which no one could achieve. Therefore
, such
an inquisitive attitude should be rewarded to promote their deep analysis as well as
positive commitments to become more responsible for their own educational roles.
On the other hand
, it is disadvantageous since critical students
will find it hard to maintain a peaceful relationship with teachers
, who may be embarrassed by their insufficiency of knowledge. Indeed, some teachers
would be offended since they expect them to oblige to rules and absorb common knowledge from textbooks as it is. Furthermore
, their unique ideas can even lose the value of an established theory, which can cause a sense of distrust among other students
. Thus
, it will be difficult for them to ensure shared knowledge and promote their understanding as they cooperate with other learners and teachers
.
In conclusion, I somewhat agree that the critical attitude of learning is beneficial to discovering an unknown theory by altering their viewpoints. However
, they can damage relationships with other students
and lecturers due to
their unfamiliar ideas that other people may find hard to follow.Submitted by mizuho on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay provides a clear response to the task and discusses both views effectively. However, ensure that your position remains consistent and clear throughout the essay.
coherence cohesion
The essay is logically structured with a clear introduction and conclusion. To improve further, consider making your transitions between ideas slightly smoother to enhance the overall flow.
supported main points
You support your main points well with relevant examples, such as the reference to the movie 'Three Idiots'. Try to incorporate more varied examples to strengthen your argument.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction effectively sets up the debate and presents your nuanced stance clearly.
relevant specific examples
The use of the example from 'Three Idiots' is a strong point that adds depth to your argument.
logical structure
The essay maintains a good structure with logical progression of ideas and a clear conclusion.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!