Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers. Some disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is thought by some people that

pop

stars

should get

money

higher than classical

music

performers

while

others believe they deserve almost the same amount of

money

. In

this

essay, both viewpoints will be discussed before reaching my opinion. On the one hand, it is true that payment should be given to

pop

stars

. These days, the fame of

pop

stars

,

such

as K-

pop

or Korean

music

, spreads worldwide. Their new albums or products are sold out within an hour and the sale value, without doubt, is higher than the classical

music

performers' works.

Hence

,

this

money

should be shared with them.

In addition

,

pop

stars

' work way more variable

as a result

they have many ways to earn their incomes. They can be hired as ambassadors, presenters, actors, etc.

while

the classical ones cannot.

On the other hand

, it is comprehensible if they obtain the same amount of cash. both of them use almost exactly the same skills

such

as singing, playing instruments and performing.

However

, classical

music

is more likely to attach specific and niche communities like hi-so. These groups of people possess a lot of

money

and they are willing to spend it on everything they like without thinking twice.

Moreover

, classical

music

performers mostly perform in large groups,

thus

, it is harder to synchronise than

pop

stars

.

Therefore

, they should obtain more cash as a reward for their efforts. In conclusion, both

pop

and classical

music

stars

are playing the same role, performing in front of people. In my opinion, it depends on their listeners and how much they can support their models.