Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Roads
and
railways
both are crucial parts of the communication system. It is believed that authorities must spend
money
on
railways
instead
of other
roads
. I completely disagree with
this
viewpoint because it may put a strain on the economy
as well as
create challenges for
people
. On the one hand, spending
money
only on
railways
may put pressure on economic growth.
That is
to say that both tracks are essential for the development of a nation, if authorities solely focus on
railways
,
then
other transportation systems will be negligible as the
roads
might not be in good condition.
Consequently
, it will be difficult to earn
money
and support the economy.
For example
, in countries, like Bangladesh, the government allocate substantial amounts of
money
for both
railways
and other
roads
as
such
they can use every transport and generate
money
as much as possible.
On the other hand
,
railways
cannot be helpful for the
people
who live in cities
due to
limited transport in the city centre.
In other words
, if the government invest more
money
in
railways
rather than
roads
and highways
then
it might create problems for
people
at the time when they commute as
roads
are not available or remain under development.
For instance
, in India, the authorities invest capital not only in
railways
but
also
in other
roads
as they try to mitigate the problems faced by
people
. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the notion that the government should spend
money
only on
railways
because it might put pressure on the economic growth of a country and there is a chance to create issues for citizens.
Submitted by mohammad39 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
A more varied use of linking words could help in making transitions between ideas smoother and your argument even clearer.
task achievement
Consider integrating more specific examples or data to solidify your arguments. While general examples are provided, more detailed instances could enhance the argument's persuasive power.
coherence cohesion
You have clearly introduced the topic and presented a clear opinion in both the introduction and conclusion.
coherence cohesion
Your essay shows a logical structure with distinct paragraphs for each main idea, demonstrating good coherence and cohesion.
task achievement
You addressed the task fully, providing a clear position throughout the essay, which is consistent with the requirements of the task.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: