In many countries, a small number of people earn extremly high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that goverments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
These days, high
salaries
are earned by a small number of communities. While
this
benefits the country by boosting the economy, restricting salaries
to a certain level could get rid of an unequal distribution
of wealth.
On one hand, the restriction of high salaries
would bring about an about an equitable distribution
of wealth. If the government distributes salaries
more evenly, this
would mean that more people
would have access to higher wages, reducing the gap between the highest and lowest earners. In addition
, this
could lead to a reduction in poverty and improved social mobility. For example
, in Switzerland, authorities limited wages in 2013 in order to reach equal distribution
; consequently
, the poverty level in this
company is low. Thus
, from one side, this
approach has positive sides too.
On the other hand
, people
who earn high salaries
could bring a number of advantages to economic growth. Firstly
, high-earners typically pay more in taxes, which can contribute significantly to the government budget and fund public services and infrastructure. Secondly
, high earners may invest in innovative projects, start businesses, or support research and development, driving economic growth and creating jobs. Therefore
, for these reasons, people
who earn high salaries
can be influential in every aspect.
In conclusion, although
restricting salaries
to a certain level can lead to equal distribution
, individuals who are high earners can contribute to an economic boost. As a result
, I think that these people
are extremely beneficial to government.Submitted by makemoneyizzy16 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay mentions a relevant example from Switzerland, but providing more specific examples or data would strengthen your argument. For instance, referencing additional countries or real-world situations can provide more depth.
task achievement
While your arguments are clear and well-presented, it would be beneficial to incorporate a counter-argument to show a balanced view. This can also help in displaying critical thinking and understanding of the topic.
coherence cohesion
Ensure there are no repeated phrases (such as 'about an about an'). A final proofread can eliminate such errors and improve the readability of your essay.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear and logical structure. The introduction sets the stage well, and each paragraph is focused on a single main idea, making it easy for the reader to follow your argument.
coherence cohesion
You have a strong conclusion that succinctly summarizes the points discussed and provides your final opinion, aligning well with the question prompt.
task achievement
The essay addresses both sides of the argument effectively, presenting a balanced view on the topic before concluding with your own opinion. This demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?