Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words.
Government budgets play an integral part in the flourishing of life. It is,
therefore
, not surprising to see how it has caused controversy among people
about whether public money
should be spent on exploring other planets or solving fundamental problems in society. Some people
firmly support the former, while
others adamantly object to it. I have solid reasons to agree with both perspectives, two of which are the need for new resources and addressing main societal problems.
To begin
with, supporters of looking for life on other planets point out that the total resources on Earth are limited. This
is a very convincing argument as finding new resources can bring significant changes for new life. For example
, the irregular availability of water, which is not an unlimited natural resource, may lead to the extinction of humanity. It may be argued that this
is crucial for the development and sustainability of humanity. Thus
, trying to find new options plays a significant role in this
issue. Additionally
, the advocates of this
matter consider that the demand for exploring and being curious about space is a telltale sign of this
effort.
On the other hand
, opponents of this
matter claim that wasting public money
on searching for other opportunities is illogical, especially when there are numerous problems on Earth. They emphasize that the main target of the government should be solving the lack of food and money
. This
is also
a quite satisfactory argument, depending on the fact that abysmal poverty and ignorance lead to unhappiness and poor health, like the conditions faced by people
in Africa. It is worth stating that this
is a persuasive point, as money
should be spent on untreated illnesses with the real aim of saving people
. In short, it can be concluded that spending money
on any problem depends on the developmental level of the country.
To sum up
, people
have totally different perspectives about this
debate. Nevertheless
, when everything is taken into account, I am inclined to believe that there should be a delicate balance between these two views.Submitted by emiretatli7 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay should have a clearer structure. Although the arguments are well-presented, ensuring that each paragraph has one main idea and supporting details can improve readability.
task achievement
Include more specific and detailed examples to strengthen your arguments. This helps in making your ideas more convincing.
task achievement
Your ideas are clear, but try to elaborate on them more comprehensively. Expanding on your points will improve the depth of your response.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion effectively frame the discussion, summarizing the key points succinctly.
task achievement
You have addressed both sides of the argument, which demonstrates a balanced approach to the topic.
task achievement
The language used is sophisticated and shows a good command of English, enhancing the overall quality of your essay.