Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Despite technological advancement forecasting preventing severe weather, there is a belief that developed
nations
should help those developing countries
suffering from many difficulties in natural disasters
. This
essay firmly agrees that it is more favorable
for human and worldwide Change the spelling
favourable
nations
to assist each other on account of moral obligation and international assistance treaties.
It is essential to acknowledge that wealthy countries
have moral accountability to help poor ones during natural disasters
. In other words
, the principle of humanity and compassion is one of the motivations, leading to help from developed countries
. Furthermore
, providing humankind relief can reflect the values of globalization and solidarity. As a result
, there has been an increasing amount of assistance to address natural disasters
globally. Take the USA as a pertinent example, where approximately 10% of their funding is utilized to prevent the natural disasters
that have occurred in many poorer nations
to show their generosity and humanitarian principles.
Another component worth considering is that all the nations
over the world have united thinking to sign global treaties to help other countries
when experiencing damage from natural disasters
. This
is because globalization and integration motivate the general benefits of economic development and the recognition of the downside of natural disasters
. In addition
, in the modern and peaceful era, the importance of diplomatic fields is a national concern and a new way to reduce the tension of dwellers from the destruction of natural disasters
. For
this
reason, more and more politicians from many nations
have worldwide meetings to unite and establish the treaties of disaster prevention.
Thus
, it can be apparently observed that moral belief and international agreement need to be considered. Therefore
, it should have been demonstrated that it is more beneficial for human civilization to enhance the quality of life in spite of serious disasters
.Submitted by Nghỉ hè vui vẻ cả nhà on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
introduction conclusion present
Strengthen the ending by summarizing key points and restating your stance to drive home your argument.
relevant specific examples
Provide slightly more specific examples or statistics to further substantiate your claims and demonstrate the severity of natural disasters in poorer countries.
logical structure
Your essay is well-structured, with logical progression of ideas and clear support for your main points.
introduction conclusion present
You have successfully included a clear introduction that outlines your stance and a coherent body that develops your argument.
supported main points
The points about moral obligation and international treaties are well-explained and relevant to the topic.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?