Some people argue that governments should spend more money on developing bullet and metro rail facilities, while others support the idea of spending money on upgrading current public transport system. discuss both views and give your opinion
There is a controversy over improving the status of the existing public
transport
rather than spending a huge amount of money on developing bullet
and metro rail facilities
; however
, I am inclined to hold the conviction that upgrading the transport
system can facilitate travelling, and it can consequently
bring about some positive results.
On the one hand, the current transport
system is actively working and giving services to thousands of individuals in all countries. Indeed, public transport
is an indispensable part of our daily life, and travelling would be a disaster without its function. Therefore
, according to
a widely held belief, this
service must be maintained and upgraded frequently to stay proficient. Germany, for instance
, is experiencing a lesser amount of traffic congestion compared to its neighbouring countries due to
the fact that this
country has always strived to keep its public transportation services up-to-date, utilized, cost-effective, and convenient, which makes its citizens reluctant to drive their personal works.
However
, other people claim that the frantic pace of technological improvements forces governments and citizens to boost themselves. According to
this
idea, artificial intelligence and technology demand a higher speed in our daily lives. Hence
, we must take advantage of the facilities
that have the potential to accelerate our journey. As a result
, governments must dedicate their endeavours and finance
to deploying Fix the agreement mistake
finances
bullet
trains and rail facilities
as much as possible. Having a faster manner of commutation can result in spending less time in traffic, feeling less tired, and having a higher ratio of motivation among people. China, for instance
, would encounter numerous issues if it did not own this
bullet
train technology as it is a populated country that would have encountered remarkable issues If it did not have high-speed railways.
In conclusion, after considering the above-mentioned points, while
many individuals assert that investing money to keep the existing transportation system facilitated is a wiser decision, I believe that governments must make efforts to develop bullet
trains and rail facilities
as they can decrease the negative consequences of long hour travels and get stuck in traffic jams.Submitted by mojgan.sobhani on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
Ensure your position is clear throughout the essay, as occasional ambiguity can weaken your argument.
Coherence and Cohesion
Use a wider range of cohesive devices to enhance the fluidity of your writing, even though it is already quite strong.
Task Achievement
Address potential counterarguments or limitations of your perspective to strengthen your response.
Coherence and Cohesion
Your essay has a clear and effective introduction and conclusion, which frames the discussion well.
Task Achievement
You provide relevant and specific examples which support your points effectively, such as references to Germany and China.
Coherence and Cohesion
Your writing is logically structured with well-developed paragraphs that flow smoothly from one to the next.