Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

These days, there is a trend where some people complain that protecting wild creatures and birds wastes resources and is overly emphasized. I strongly agree with

this

argument because there are many more problems for humanity rather than conserving them,

although

biodiversity has attracted the

government

's attention The first point to consider is that excessive focus on

wildlife

protection often overshadows more pressing human concerns.

For instance

, resources

such

as manpower and funding to build sophisticated facilities for an endangered species are so vast that some African countries could not afford them, resulting in

government

budget cuts for critical human needs including healthcare, education and poverty alleviation.

Although

heavy investment in

wildlife

protection can make some difference, there may

also

be instances of corruption within

such

projects.Redirecting these funds could potentially save numerous lives in communities suffering from natural disasters.

Additionally

, excessive focus on

wildlife

protection can lead to potential negative consequences for local communities. Often,

conservation

efforts involve restricting access to forest resources that residents depend on, leading to economic hardship.In parts of Asia,

for instance

, the establishment of these areas for tigers usually resulted in the displacement of local people.Not only does

this

raise the conflict between humans and

wildlife

, but it

also

creates ethical problems about the fairness of

such

conservation

strategies.

To sum up

, it is safe to draw the conclusion that excessive focus and funding on

wildlife

conservation

is problematic,

due to

the financial burden for the

government

as well as

lifestyle changes for local communities.

Therefore

, it is essential for the

government

to implement

conservation

projects carefully for both

wildlife

and human welfare.