Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent times, there have been several debates about whether old
buildings
are more worth preserving than other ones. In my perspective, I partly agree with
this
point of view. First and foremost, people should recognize the fact that numerous old
buildings
hold significant historical value. It is obvious that a huge number of historic constructions reflect the way people live, work, and create their communities. Some of them even relate to historical events and now become the cultural identity of the cities in which they are located. Another justification that should not be ignored is that some old
buildings
can be considered as teaching tools.
For instance
, they could be transformed into museums and other tourist attractions.
This
not only boosts the cultural values of those constructions but
also
raises community sense.
On the other hand
, there are some reasons that against the statement of preserving old
buildings
. It is vital to recognize that preserving those constructions requires a huge amount of money.
This
could become a financial burden for not only the owners and community but
also
financial support from the national budget.
In other words
, preserving and restoring those ancient
buildings
also
limits land use in the city. There is a limitation in land that could be used to build new infrastructure and conduct other important city projects
such
as hospitals, schools, companies, or social housing.
This
might hinder the development of urban areas and modernization. In conclusion, I partly support the statement of preserving old
buildings
.
However
, I believe that we should consider carefully before reaching the final decision.
Submitted by anhpham.712688 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your essay addresses the prompt effectively, but ensure to maintain focus on the question throughout to score higher in Task Achievement. For instance, the positive aspects of preserving old buildings could be elaborated further with more specific examples.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a logical structure and progression of ideas. However, try to improve the coherence by using more varied linking words and phrases, and avoid repetitive transitions such as 'First and foremost'.
coherence cohesion
Make sure to introduce and conclude your points smoothly. Your introduction and conclusion are generally well-structured, but the conclusion could restate the main points more clearly.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear structure with both an introduction and a conclusion, which is crucial in IELTS essays.
coherence cohesion
You have logically supported your main points with examples, like turning old buildings into museums and tourist attractions.
task response
You have provided a balanced view, discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of preserving old buildings.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: