some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems such as railways and trams. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whether or not funding should be allocated to roads and motorised vehicle paths rather than spent on public

transport

is a debatable topic.

This

writer contends that investments in public transportation systems are much more necessary, for their cost-effectiveness and reduced cost of long-distance travel. It is crucial to understand that, a well-organised public

transport

scheme is desired to help a lot of people commute in just one single trip.

Due to

the fact that the public

transport

system

can carry many more customers at a time, it is very economical as there is only a need for fewer vehicles to

transport

a larger quantity of passengers.

Therefore

, the amount of money saved on developing vehicles can diverted for improvements of

transport

system

infrastructure

such

as roads.

For instance

, Japan has highly developed modes of public transportation

such

as trains, they only need to use a small fraction of the economy to develop a reliable

system

. Despite these, many people still argue that public vehicles when carrying passengers over long distances will always charge exorbitant prices.

This

viewpoint is totally falsehood, almost all

transport

systems nowadays are funded by governments. Because of

this

travelling long distances will only cost the customers the average price of a ticket. As an example,

Japanese

Correct article usage

the Japanese

show examples

governments

Fix the agreement mistake

government

show examples

funded all of the nation's

transport

system

making it cheaper for all citizens to use. In conclusion. investing ob public

transport

systems would be more beneficial for long-distance travel.

Thus

, it should have been demonstrated that spending money on public

transport

is a wise decision