In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

In modern times, owing to national economic growth, there is a belief that a minority of

people

becoming richer and richer with their high wages could develop countries,

while

other

people

think that authorities should restrict the

amount

of salary they earn.

This

essay firmly believes that it is beneficial for human civilization to continue

this

phenomenon

due to

tax

revenue generation and the higher quality of life, despite those who assume that the

wealthy

Replace the word

wealth

show examples

gap could be widened. It is vital to acknowledge that if the number of

people

earned more

money

, the

amount

of

tax

would increase.

In other words

, the governmental funding

that is

utilized for developing all other fields of the nation,

such

as education and transportation systems, is based on the

amount

of

money

generated by taxes.

Furthermore

, the more

money

people

earned, the more

tax

they had to pay, leading to the construction and modernization of infrastructure.

For

this

reason, the strength of one nation can be enhanced by taxes, contributing to an increase in opportunities to compete with other countries in the global market. Some critics,

however

, presume that the gap between the rich and the poor is widening on account of the neglect of

this

circumstance by the government. They believe that inequality of wages could cause many internal conflicts, breaking down the solidarity of one nation, motivating the civil war, and making that country weaker and weaker.

This

point has credibility, yet authorities can use the

amount

of

money

from

tax

Fix the agreement mistake

taxes

show examples

paid by the higher-salary

people

to improve and construct an excessive number of cutting-edge public amenities for dwellers to reduce social tension.

As a result

,

instead

of receiving anger from the public, the government could be confirmed and gain strong support from citizens. From

this

writer’s perspective, the improvement in the quality of civil life must

also

be noticed.

This

is

due to

the fact that, with the large

resource

Fix the agreement mistake

resources

show examples

of higher-wage

people

, authorities could have a fiercely ambitious plan to build the most modern and cost-effective amenities for citizens to enhance their living conditions. In

this

situation,

people

are willing to collaborate with politicians to upgrade their countries into some of the most state-of-the-art nations in the world. Take the USA as a pertinent example, where the living environment of

people

was improved from time to time by those who had high income, becoming the most powerful

nations

Fix the agreement mistake

nation

show examples

throughout nearly a century.

Thus

, the possible influence of the

tax

system and the living conditions of dwellers need to be considered.

Therefore

, it should have been demonstrated that it is advantageous for nations to develop themselves by liberating the

amount

of

money

they earn during the globalization era.